EU Law Radar

Monitoring References to the Court of Justice of the European Union

Tag

procedural rules

7 case reports

Case C-571/26, Kahmus – res judicata over a question nobody asked

In Estonian consumer insolvency a credit claim already covered by a final judgment counts as uncontested — even where the reasons do not show that any court ever asked whether the lender assessed the borrower's ability to repay. The Riigikohus asks whether finality can carry a question that was never put.

Case C-572/26, Kangi – fifteen days to object to something nobody told you

An Estonian order for payment issues on a consumer credit claim without any court checking whether the lender ever assessed the borrower's ability to repay — and enforcement checks nothing either. The consumer has fifteen days to object, on papers that never mention the point. The Riigikohus asks whether that is enough.

Case C-159/25, Rowicz – the generator that picks your judge

A Polish judge was released from her cases against the rules, and the replacement was drawn by a random-allocation system built by the Ministry of Justice whose source code nobody may inspect. Is a court composed that way still a tribunal established by law? The Warsaw Regional Court asks.