EU Law Radar

Monitoring References to the Court of Justice of the European Union

326 case reportsest. 201211 fields of lawsources: CURIA · EUR-Lexlast sweep 2026-10-14

The questions national courts ask, before Luxembourg answers them.

Preliminary references are EU law's early-warning system: every reference is a dispute a national judge could not resolve alone. EU Law Radar reports them as they are lodged — the questions quoted verbatim — and follows each case through to judgment.

Case C-832/26, Autostrade per l'Italia – full toll for a motorway under repair

Italy's competition authority found that Autostrade per l'Italia engaged in an unfair commercial practice by charging full tolls while the service fell short because of its own lack of diligence, where drivers had no real alternative. The Consiglio di Stato asks whether the Unfair Commercial Practices Directive stretches that far — or whether a price that should have been cut is a matter for contract law.

Case C-848/26, Hoist Italia – the lender that did not check, and the buyer that did not lend

A lender failed to assess a borrower's creditworthiness and then sold the loan to Hoist Italia, a buyer of consumer debt. Italian law lets the borrower claim only against the original lender, for pre-contractual liability and damages. A court in Busto Arsizio asks whether that sanction is effective enough under the Consumer Credit Directive when the debt is being collected by someone else.

Case C-843/26, Ies and Atlas Aerospace – who may build Europe's weapons with Europe's loans?

The EU's €150 billion SAFE defence-loan instrument excludes contractors controlled by third countries — unless they have passed foreign-investment screening. In an Italian Ministry of Defence tender, a bidder relied on a firm holding a screening authorisation from another Member State. The first two references on SAFE ask whether the exclusion reaches companies a bidder merely relies on, and whether another Member State's clearance binds the buyer.

Case C-599/26, Geniko Nosokomeio Kilkis – the bonus the public sector lost

Greek law obliges every employer to pay Christmas, Easter and holiday bonuses worth two months' salary — except employers in the public sector, which stopped paying them in the crisis years. Hospital staff in Kilkis, most of whom now earn less per year than the statutory minimum wage, ask whether the Adequate Minimum Wages Directive allows that.

Case C-627/26, Rasone – is an air traffic controller a public servant?

Latvia's air navigation provider, a state-owned company, requires its air traffic controllers to hold security clearance for classified information — which in practice excludes nationals of other Member States. A licensed EU controller challenged the exclusion. Latvia's Supreme Court asks whether the post falls within the public service exception, and whether airspace security in a 'complex geopolitical context' can justify it.

Case C-672/26, Konkurrensverket – when the in-house company sells to everyone else

Fourteen Skåne municipalities award contracts directly to a jointly owned company, relying on the in-house exception. That exception requires more than 80% of the company's activities to serve the owners. Sweden's competition authority says the company's sales to third parties on a competitive market should not count towards the 80%. The Supreme Administrative Court asks the Court.

Fields of law

How this site works

Verbatim, or not at all

The questions referred are quoted word-for-word from the official texts. Commentary is clearly separated from the record.

Every claim has a source

Each report links the authentic documents on CURIA and EUR-Lex by ECLI and CELEX number.

An archive that stays put

URLs cited in academic literature since 2012 do not change. Corrections are logged, never silently overwritten.