EU Law Radar

Monitoring References to the Court of Justice of the European Union

349 case reportsest. 201211 fields of lawsources: CURIA · EUR-Lexlast sweep 2026-11-10

The questions national courts ask, before Luxembourg answers them.

Preliminary references are EU law's early-warning system: every reference is a dispute a national judge could not resolve alone. EU Law Radar reports them as they are lodged — the questions quoted verbatim — and follows each case through to judgment.

Case C-585/26, Trezor Company – a newsletter, a processor and a server abroad

A customer of Trezor, the hardware wallet maker, signed up for its newsletter and now complains that his data were processed on servers in the United States. The Austrian Supreme Court asks whether handing data to a processor needs its own legal basis under the GDPR, and whether consent to a newsletter is informed if the subscriber was not told that a processor outside the EU would send it.

Case C-715/26, Szabadszentkirály Község Önkormányzata – when does the clock start on an EU grant?

Nine Hungarian villages that received an EU co-financed grant face a claim arising from an irregularity: they did not take the required measures against conflicts of interest when awarding the contract, although the contract itself broke no procurement rule. The Pécs Regional Court asks when the four-year limitation period starts, and when a 2014-2020 project counts as a 'multiannual programme' that is 'definitively terminated'.

Case C-773/26, Füget – a court that pays for being late

Hungarian law requires a court that misses a statutory deadline for acting to pay financial compensation. The Szeged Regional Court, hearing a case against the immigration authorities and the Constitution Protection Office, asks whether that is compatible with the effectiveness of EU law and with the independence of the courts that apply it.

Fields of law

How this site works

Verbatim, or not at all

The questions referred are quoted word-for-word from the official texts. Commentary is clearly separated from the record.

Every claim has a source

Each report links the authentic documents on CURIA and EUR-Lex by ECLI and CELEX number.

An archive that stays put

URLs cited in academic literature since 2012 do not change. Corrections are logged, never silently overwritten.