EU Law Radar

Monitoring References to the Court of Justice of the European Union

Posted on May 20, 2012 by admin

Can a company use the EU’s Database Directive 96/9 to stop minute parts of its website turning up on a rival website?

Posted in E-Commerce, IP law | Tagged copyright, database, extraction, insubstantial part, reutilisation, website

Posted on May 19, 2012 by admin

Does the EU’s Misleading Advertising Directive 2006/114 mean that the concept of ‘advertising’ covers the domain name of a website or its metatags?

Posted in E-Commerce, IP law | Tagged advertising, domain name, metatag, trade mark, website

EU Law Radar alerts you to developments in European competition, E-Commerce, IP, labour, and privacy law.

The reports posted here help you to keep up to date with forthcoming cases to be heard at the Court of Justice of the European Union.

Readers are requested not to put any report, or part thereof, onto another website. Thank you.

Case IP/24/6487, TikTok – The Romanian Rumble
Commission Decision, X (formerly Twitter) – A €120 Million Invoice for a “Blue Tick” that Verifies Nothing
Case C-826/24 P, Commission v Google – The Regulator’s Desperate Bid to Save a €1.49 bn Fine
Legal Shield: scam, pyramid, or legitimate opportunity?