EU Law Radar

Monitoring References to the Court of Justice of the European Union

Tag

commission

12 case reports

Case C-909/26 P, Meta Platforms v Commission – is Messenger its own gateway?

In June the General Court annulled Meta's gatekeeper designation for Marketplace but upheld it for Messenger. Meta now appeals the half it lost, on a single ground: that Messenger is the chat function of Facebook, not a separate number-independent communications service. The answer decides how the Digital Markets Act carves a company's products into services.

Case C-535/25, Amazon Italia Logistica – is a warehouse a post office?

Italy's communications regulator decided that Amazon's logistics, locker and transport-organising arms are postal service providers needing authorisation under the Postal Services Directive. Three Amazon companies say they never clear, sort, transport or deliver anything. The Advocate General has proposed that organising and controlling those who do is enough.

Case C-496/23 P, Meta Platforms Ireland v Commission – how wide may a search term be?

In its Facebook investigations the Commission demanded every document held by named executives that matched broad search terms, over years, whatever it contained. The General Court found that 'necessary'. Meta's two appeals ask whether necessity is tested term by term or in the round, and what protects the personal information swept up. The Advocate General has proposed dismissing both.

Case C-143/26 P, Intel v Commission – the last fifth of a seventeen-year case

Intel's €1.06 billion fine of 2009 was annulled in 2022 on the rebates; what survived were the 'naked restrictions' — payments to HP, Acer and Lenovo to delay or drop AMD-based products. The Commission re-fined those at €376 million in 2023, the General Court cut it to €237 million in December 2025, and Intel now appeals what is left.

Case C-744/25 P, Commission v Meta Platforms Ireland – a fee without a formula

The Digital Services Act lets the Commission bill very large platforms for the cost of supervising them, using a methodology it must lay down by delegated act. When it set Meta's and TikTok's fees it counted their users its own way, explained in an annex. The General Court annulled both decisions. The Commission appeals, saying an explanation is not a methodology.

Case C-724/25 P, Zalando v Commission – who counts as a recipient?

Zalando told the Commission that 83 million people visit its store each month but that only 37% of what they see comes from third-party sellers — so only 31 million are 'recipients' of a platform. The Commission counted all of them. The General Court agreed. Zalando's appeal asks whether exposure to third-party content must be proved or may be presumed.

Case C-40/26 P, Amazon EU v Commission – a marketplace is not a social network

Amazon was designated a very large online platform under the Digital Services Act and lost its challenge in November 2025. It now tells the Court that a marketplace carries none of the 'systemic risks' the Act was written for, and that treating it like a social network breaches the Charter. The Commission has cross-appealed, saying the General Court should never have looked.

Case C-819/24 P, Qualcomm v Commission – the cost of selling below cost

The Commission fined Qualcomm €242 million for selling baseband chipsets to Huawei and ZTE below cost to squeeze out Icera. The General Court trimmed the fine and upheld the rest. Qualcomm's seven-plea appeal is the Court's first chance in over a decade to say how predatory pricing is proved — and whether effects must be shown.

Case C-627/24 P, ByteDance v Commission – can a gatekeeper argue its way out?

TikTok met every numerical threshold in the Digital Markets Act and was designated a gatekeeper in the Act's first wave. ByteDance says the presumptions can be rebutted and that the General Court made them impossible to rebut. The first DMA appeal to reach the Court of Justice will say how much a designated company may argue.